Group Stage Assessment
For each completed group, the Institute presents its projected final standings — derived by applying standard FIFA points allocation to the Institute's certified scoreline predictions — alongside the standings that actually obtained. The comparison is presented without editorial redaction. The Institute notes what it got right. The Institute also notes what it did not.
Groups advance to this page only upon completion of all six fixtures. Partial groups are not assessed; the Institute does not extrapolate from incomplete data.
Completed Groups
Group A
Mexico · South Africa · South Korea · Czechia
Full Alignment
Institute Projected Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mexico | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 9 |
| 2 | South Africa | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | South Korea | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | −1 | 4 |
| 4 | Czechia | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | −3 | 0 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mexico | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 |
| 2 | South Africa | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −1 | 4 |
| 3 | South Korea | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | −1 | 3 |
| 4 | Czechia | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | −4 | 1 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Mexico
→
Mexico
Confirmed
2nd
South Africa
→
South Africa
Confirmed
3rd
South Korea
→
South Korea
Confirmed
4th
Czechia
→
Czechia
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Mexico vs South Africa | Mexico 2–1 South Africa | Mexico 2–0 South Africa | Confirmed |
| 002 | South Korea vs Czechia | South Korea 2–1 Czechia | South Korea 2–1 Czechia | Exact |
| 025 | Czechia vs South Africa | South Africa 2–1 Czechia | Czechia 1–1 South Africa | Anomalous |
| 028 | Mexico vs South Korea | Mexico 2–0 South Korea | Mexico 1–0 South Korea | Confirmed |
| 053 | Czechia vs Mexico | Mexico 2–1 Czechia | Mexico 3–0 Czechia | Confirmed |
| 054 | South Africa vs South Korea | South Africa 1–1 South Korea | South Africa 1–0 South Korea | Anomalous |
Group A produced the Institute's second full positional alignment: Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, and Czechia in confirmed order. Mexico's dominance was complete — three wins, no goals conceded. The Institute's certified draw between South Africa and South Korea was anomalous in scoreline; the structural consequence, South Africa advancing over South Korea on head-to-head record, was nonetheless correct. The group order held.
Group B
Canada · Switzerland · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Qatar
Partial Alignment
Institute Projected Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Canada | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 |
| 2 | Switzerland | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 |
| 3 | Bosnia & Herz. | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | −1 | 2 |
| 4 | Qatar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | −3 | 1 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Switzerland | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 7 |
| 2 | Canada | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 4 |
| 3 | Bosnia & Herz. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | −1 | 4 |
| 4 | Qatar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | −8 | 1 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Canada
→
Switzerland
Anomalous
2nd
Switzerland
→
Canada
Anomalous
3rd
Bosnia & Herz.
→
Bosnia & Herz.
Confirmed
4th
Qatar
→
Qatar
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Canada vs Bosnia & Herz. | Canada 2–1 Bosnia | Canada 1–1 Bosnia | Anomalous |
| 008 | Qatar vs Switzerland | Qatar 0–1 Switzerland | Qatar 1–1 Switzerland | Anomalous |
| 026 | Switzerland vs Bosnia & Herz. | Switzerland 1–1 Bosnia | Switzerland 4–1 Bosnia | Anomalous |
| 027 | Canada vs Qatar | Canada 2–0 Qatar | Canada 6–0 Qatar | Confirmed |
| 051 | Switzerland vs Canada | Switzerland 1–1 Canada | Switzerland 3–1 Canada | Anomalous |
| 052 | Bosnia & Herz. vs Qatar | Bosnia 1–1 Qatar | Bosnia 3–1 Qatar | Anomalous |
The Institute correctly identified the lower half of the group: Bosnia and Herzegovina in third, Qatar in fourth. The misidentification of the group winner is noted and filed. Canada and Switzerland inverted their certified positions; the Institute's composite confidence readings for this group's decisive fixture were within the contested 78–84% band, a range the revised Margin Resolution Protocol acknowledges as structurally ambiguous.
Group C
Brazil · Morocco · Scotland · Haiti
Full Alignment
Institute Projected Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brazil | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 9 |
| 2 | Morocco | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | Scotland | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | −1 | 3 |
| 4 | Haiti | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | −4 | 1 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brazil | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 7 |
| 2 | Morocco | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 |
| 3 | Scotland | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | −3 | 3 |
| 4 | Haiti | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | −6 | 0 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Brazil
→
Brazil
Confirmed
2nd
Morocco
→
Morocco
Confirmed
3rd
Scotland
→
Scotland
Confirmed
4th
Haiti
→
Haiti
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Haiti vs Scotland | Haiti 0–2 Scotland | Haiti 0–1 Scotland | Confirmed |
| 007 | Brazil vs Morocco | Brazil 2–1 Morocco | Brazil 1–1 Morocco | Anomalous |
| 029 | Brazil vs Haiti | Brazil 3–1 Haiti | Brazil 3–0 Haiti | Confirmed |
| 030 | Scotland vs Morocco | Morocco 2–1 Scotland | Morocco 1–0 Scotland | Confirmed |
| 049 | Scotland vs Brazil | Brazil 3–1 Scotland | Brazil 3–0 Scotland | Confirmed |
| 050 | Morocco vs Haiti | Morocco 1–1 Haiti | Morocco 4–2 Haiti | Anomalous |
Group C represents the Institute's most complete group-stage assessment to date. All four final positions align with projection. The methodology correctly identified Brazil as group winners, Morocco as runners-up, Scotland as third, and Haiti as eliminated in last place. Individual scoreline variance is noted but did not disturb the structural order. The Institute records this outcome with appropriate equanimity.
Group D
United States · Australia · Türkiye · Paraguay
Partial Alignment
Institute Projected Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Türkiye | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 9 |
| 2 | Australia | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 6 |
| 3 | United States | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | −1 | 3 |
| 4 | Paraguay | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | −3 | 0 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 6 |
| 2 | Australia | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | Paraguay | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | −3 | 4 |
| 4 | Türkiye | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | −2 | 3 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Türkiye
→
United States
Anomalous
2nd
Australia
→
Australia
Confirmed
3rd
United States
→
Paraguay
Anomalous
4th
Paraguay
→
Türkiye
Anomalous
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | United States vs Paraguay | United States 2–1 Paraguay | United States 4–1 Paraguay | Confirmed |
| 006 | Australia vs Türkiye | Australia 1–2 Türkiye | Australia 2–0 Türkiye | Anomalous |
| 031 | United States vs Australia | Australia 2–1 United States | United States 2–0 Australia | Anomalous |
| 032 | Türkiye vs Paraguay | Türkiye 1–0 Paraguay | Türkiye 0–1 Paraguay | Anomalous |
| 059 | Türkiye vs United States | Türkiye 2–1 United States | Türkiye 3–2 United States | Confirmed |
| 060 | Paraguay vs Australia | Paraguay 0–1 Australia | Paraguay 0–0 Australia | Anomalous |
Group D is the Institute's most anomalous completed group. Only Australia's second-place finish was correctly certified; the group winner, the host United States, was projected third. The Institute certified Türkiye as group winners across three fixtures; Türkiye finished last. Four of six individual fixture directions were incorrect. The Institute notes and files this without amendment.
Group E
Germany · Ivory Coast · Ecuador · Curaçao
Full Alignment
Institute Projected Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Germany | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 9 |
| 2 | Ivory Coast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | Ecuador | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | −3 | 3 |
| 4 | Curaçao | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | −2 | 1 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Germany | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 6 |
| 2 | Ivory Coast | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 |
| 3 | Ecuador | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 4 | Curaçao | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | −8 | 1 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Germany
→
Germany
Confirmed
2nd
Ivory Coast
→
Ivory Coast
Confirmed
3rd
Ecuador
→
Ecuador
Confirmed
4th
Curaçao
→
Curaçao
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ivory Coast vs Ecuador | Ivory Coast 3–1 Ecuador | Ivory Coast 1–0 Ecuador | Confirmed |
| 010 | Germany vs Curaçao | Germany 2–1 Curaçao | Germany 7–1 Curaçao | Confirmed |
| 033 | Germany vs Ivory Coast | Germany 2–0 Ivory Coast | Germany 2–1 Ivory Coast | Confirmed |
| 034 | Ecuador vs Curaçao | Ecuador 2–1 Curaçao | Ecuador 0–0 Curaçao | Anomalous |
| 055 | Curaçao vs Ivory Coast | Curaçao 0–0 Ivory Coast | Ivory Coast 2–0 Curaçao | Anomalous |
| 056 | Ecuador vs Germany | Germany 2–0 Ecuador | Ecuador 2–1 Germany | Anomalous |
Group E returned a third full positional alignment despite considerable scoreline variance. Germany qualified top as certified, Ivory Coast second, Ecuador third, Curaçao last. The certified winner of three of the six fixtures was incorrect at the scoreline level; nonetheless, the structural hierarchy held. Ecuador's defeat of Germany in the final round, noted here, did not alter the group order — Germany's head-to-head record against Ivory Coast proved decisive.
Group F
Netherlands · Japan · Sweden · Tunisia
Partial Alignment
Institute Projected Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Netherlands | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 9 |
| 2 | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | Japan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | −2 | 4 |
| 4 | Tunisia | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | −3 | 0 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Netherlands | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 7 |
| 2 | Japan | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 5 |
| 3 | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| 4 | Tunisia | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 12 | −10 | 0 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Netherlands
→
Netherlands
Confirmed
2nd
Sweden
→
Japan
Anomalous
3rd
Japan
→
Sweden
Anomalous
4th
Tunisia
→
Tunisia
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Netherlands vs Japan | Netherlands 3–0 Japan | Netherlands 2–2 Japan | Anomalous |
| 012 | Sweden vs Tunisia | Sweden 1–0 Tunisia | Sweden 5–1 Tunisia | Confirmed |
| 035 | Netherlands vs Sweden | Netherlands 2–1 Sweden | Netherlands 5–1 Sweden | Confirmed |
| 036 | Tunisia vs Japan | Japan 2–1 Tunisia | Japan 4–0 Tunisia | Confirmed |
| 057 | Japan vs Sweden | Japan 1–1 Sweden | Japan 1–1 Sweden | Exact |
| 058 | Tunisia vs Netherlands | Netherlands 1–0 Tunisia | Netherlands 3–1 Tunisia | Confirmed |
The Institute correctly identified the group winner (Netherlands) and the eliminated side (Tunisia). The middle positions inverted: the Institute placed Sweden second and Japan third; the actual order was Japan second, Sweden third. The certified Japan–Sweden draw was exact. The Institute notes that Japan's failure to concede against the Netherlands in Matchday 1 — rendering a draw where a Dutch win was certified — was the proximate cause of the positional inversion.
Group G
Belgium · Egypt · Iran · New Zealand
Full Alignment
Institute Predicted Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belgium | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 7 |
| 2 | Egypt | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 7 |
| 3 | Iran | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | −1 | 3 |
| 4 | New Zealand | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | −4 | 0 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belgium | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 5 |
| 2 | Egypt | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 5 |
| 3 | Iran | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 4 | New Zealand | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | −6 | 1 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Belgium
→
Belgium
Confirmed
2nd
Egypt
→
Egypt
Confirmed
3rd
Iran
→
Iran
Confirmed
4th
New Zealand
→
New Zealand
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Iran vs New Zealand | Iran 3–1 New Zealand | Iran 2–2 New Zealand | Anomalous |
| 016 | Belgium vs Egypt | Belgium 1–1 Egypt | Belgium 1–1 Egypt | Exact |
| 039 | Belgium vs Iran | Belgium 2–0 Iran | Belgium 0–0 Iran | Anomalous |
| 040 | New Zealand vs Egypt | Egypt 1–0 New Zealand | Egypt 3–1 New Zealand | Confirmed |
| 063 | Egypt vs Iran | Egypt 1–0 Iran | Egypt 1–1 Iran | Anomalous |
| 064 | New Zealand vs Belgium | Belgium 1–0 New Zealand | Belgium 5–1 New Zealand | Confirmed |
The Institute correctly identified all four final positions in Group G — a Full Alignment result. Belgium and Egypt advanced as certified. Iran finished third as certified. New Zealand finished last as certified. The individual scorelines diverged considerably from projections: Belgium's certified 2–0 win over Iran returned a scoreless draw; the certified Egyptian victory over Iran returned a draw. Nevertheless, the group hierarchy was reproduced precisely, and the Institute accepts this outcome with measured satisfaction.
Group H
Spain · Uruguay · Saudi Arabia · Cape Verde
Partial Alignment
Institute Predicted Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spain | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 |
| 2 | Uruguay | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 |
| 3 | Cape Verde | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | −3 | 1 |
| 4 | Saudi Arabia | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | −3 | 1 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spain | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 7 |
| 2 | Cape Verde | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | Uruguay | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | −1 | 2 |
| 4 | Saudi Arabia | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | −4 | 2 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Spain
→
Spain
Confirmed
2nd
Uruguay
→
Cape Verde
Anomalous
3rd
Cape Verde
→
Uruguay
Anomalous
4th
Saudi Arabia
→
Saudi Arabia
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Saudi Arabia vs Uruguay | Uruguay 2–1 Saudi Arabia | Saudi Arabia 1–1 Uruguay | Anomalous |
| 014 | Spain vs Cape Verde | Spain 2–1 Cape Verde | Spain 0–0 Cape Verde | Anomalous |
| 037 | Uruguay vs Cape Verde | Uruguay 2–0 Cape Verde | Uruguay 2–2 Cape Verde | Anomalous |
| 038 | Spain vs Saudi Arabia | Spain 2–0 Saudi Arabia | Spain 4–0 Saudi Arabia | Confirmed |
| 065 | Cape Verde vs Saudi Arabia | Cape Verde 1–1 Saudi Arabia | Cape Verde 0–0 Saudi Arabia | Confirmed |
| 066 | Uruguay vs Spain | Uruguay 1–1 Spain | Spain 1–0 Uruguay | Anomalous |
The Institute correctly identified the group winner (Spain) and the eliminated side (Saudi Arabia). Positions two and three inverted: the Institute placed Uruguay second and Cape Verde third; the actual order was Cape Verde second, Uruguay third. Cape Verde advanced with three consecutive draws — a qualification path the Institute's decisive-scoreline methodology did not model. The certified Spain victory over Uruguay was directionally correct; the Institute had certified a draw, yet Spain prevailed. This is noted as an anomalous outcome and filed without further comment.
Group I
France · Norway · Senegal · Iraq
Partial Alignment
Institute Predicted Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Senegal | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 9 |
| 2 | France | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 |
| 3 | Norway | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 4 | Iraq | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | −5 | 0 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norway | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 9 |
| 2 | France | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 6 |
| 3 | Senegal | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 3 |
| 4 | Iraq | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12 | −11 | 0 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Senegal
→
Norway
Anomalous
2nd
France
→
France
Confirmed
3rd
Norway
→
Senegal
Anomalous
4th
Iraq
→
Iraq
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | France vs Senegal | Senegal 1–0 France | France 3–1 Senegal | Anomalous |
| 018 | Iraq vs Norway | Norway 2–1 Iraq | Norway 4–1 Iraq | Confirmed |
| 041 | Norway vs Senegal | Senegal 1–0 Norway | Norway 3–2 Senegal | Anomalous |
| 042 | France vs Iraq | France 2–0 Iraq | France 3–0 Iraq | Confirmed |
| 061 | Norway vs France | Norway 1–1 France | Norway 4–1 France | Anomalous |
| 062 | Senegal vs Iraq | Senegal 2–0 Iraq | Senegal 5–0 Iraq | Confirmed |
The Institute predicted Senegal would win Group I with a perfect record; Norway instead claimed that distinction, also unbeaten. France was correctly placed second. The primary anomaly is the Norway–Senegal axis: the Institute certified Senegal victories in both head-to-head fixtures involving Norway, yet Norway defeated Senegal 3–2 in Matchday 2 and dismantled France 4–1 in the final round. The Norwegian goal-scoring volume across all three fixtures exceeded certified projections by a significant margin. Iraq finished last as projected.
Group J
Argentina · Austria · Algeria · Jordan
Partial Alignment
Institute Predicted Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Argentina | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 7 |
| 2 | Austria | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 6 |
| 3 | Jordan | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | −1 | 3 |
| 4 | Algeria | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | −2 | 1 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Argentina | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | +7 | 9 |
| 2 | Austria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | Algeria | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | −2 | 4 |
| 4 | Jordan | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | −5 | 0 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Argentina
→
Argentina
Confirmed
2nd
Austria
→
Austria
Confirmed
3rd
Jordan
→
Algeria
Anomalous
4th
Algeria
→
Jordan
Anomalous
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Argentina vs Algeria | Argentina 1–1 Algeria | Argentina 3–0 Algeria | Anomalous |
| 020 | Austria vs Jordan | Austria 1–0 Jordan | Austria 3–1 Jordan | Confirmed |
| 043 | Argentina vs Austria | Argentina 2–1 Austria | Argentina 2–0 Austria | Confirmed |
| 044 | Jordan vs Algeria | Jordan 1–0 Algeria | Algeria 2–1 Jordan | Anomalous |
| 069 | Algeria vs Austria | Austria 2–1 Algeria | Algeria 3–3 Austria | Anomalous |
| 070 | Jordan vs Argentina | Argentina 2–1 Jordan | Argentina 3–1 Jordan | Confirmed |
The Institute correctly certified the top two positions in Group J — Argentina first, Austria second — and both margins of superiority over the field were reproduced in structural terms. Argentina's actual winning record was more emphatic than projected: nine points, eight goals scored, one conceded, with Messi recording his nineteenth World Cup goal in the final fixture. The bottom two positions inverted: the Institute placed Jordan third and Algeria fourth; Algeria's six-goal draw with Austria in the final round delivered four points and third place, while Jordan won no points across three matches. The certified Austrian victory over Algeria returned the most chaotic result of the group stage: a 3–3 draw settled by Mahrez in stoppage time and then immediately equalised by Kalajdžić. The Institute does not speculate on what the Bermuda grass coefficient would have predicted had it known.
Group K
Portugal · Colombia · DR Congo · Uzbekistan
Partial Alignment
Institute Predicted Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colombia | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 9 |
| 2 | DR Congo | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 |
| 3 | Portugal | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | −3 | 1 |
| 4 | Uzbekistan | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | −3 | 1 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colombia | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 7 |
| 2 | Portugal | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 5 |
| 3 | DR Congo | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 4 |
| 4 | Uzbekistan | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | −9 | 0 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Colombia
→
Colombia
Confirmed
2nd
DR Congo
→
Portugal
Anomalous
3rd
Portugal
→
DR Congo
Anomalous
4th
Uzbekistan
→
Uzbekistan
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Portugal vs DR Congo | DR Congo 1–0 Portugal | Portugal 1–1 DR Congo | Anomalous |
| 024 | Uzbekistan vs Colombia | Colombia 2–0 Uzbekistan | Colombia 3–1 Uzbekistan | Confirmed |
| 047 | Portugal vs Uzbekistan | Portugal 1–1 Uzbekistan | Portugal 5–0 Uzbekistan | Anomalous |
| 048 | Colombia vs DR Congo | Colombia 2–1 DR Congo | Colombia 1–0 DR Congo | Confirmed |
| 071 | Colombia vs Portugal | Colombia 2–0 Portugal | Colombia 0–0 Portugal | Anomalous |
| 072 | DR Congo vs Uzbekistan | DR Congo 1–0 Uzbekistan | DR Congo 3–1 Uzbekistan | Confirmed |
Colombia's certified dominance was structurally reproduced: they topped the group as certified, and Uzbekistan finished last as certified. The anomaly lies in the middle two positions. The Institute placed DR Congo second and Portugal third; Portugal in fact finished second with five points, DR Congo third with four. The decisive fixture was the Colombia–Portugal final-round encounter: the Institute certified a Colombian victory that would have confirmed the certified order, but the match concluded goalless despite Colombia registering twenty-four attempts. Portugal's five-goal dismantling of Uzbekistan in Matchday 2, which the Institute certified as a draw, was the largest margin of error in an individual result across this group. DR Congo advanced to the knockout stage for the first time in their history, which the Institute notes with appropriate neutrality.
Group L
England · Croatia · Ghana · Panama
Partial Alignment
Institute Predicted Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Croatia | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 7 |
| 2 | Ghana | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 | England | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | −1 | 3 |
| 4 | Panama | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | −2 | 3 |
Actual Final Standings
| # | Team | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | England | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 7 |
| 2 | Croatia | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | Ghana | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 4 | Panama | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | −4 | 0 |
Position-by-Position Comparison
1st
Croatia
→
England
Anomalous
2nd
Ghana
→
Croatia
Anomalous
3rd
England
→
Ghana
Anomalous
4th
Panama
→
Panama
Confirmed
Individual Fixture Record
| Report | Fixture | Predicted | Actual | Determination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Ghana vs Panama | Panama 1–0 Ghana | Ghana 1–0 Panama | Anomalous |
| 022 | England vs Croatia | Croatia 2–1 England | England 4–2 Croatia | Anomalous |
| 045 | England vs Ghana | Ghana 2–1 England | England 0–0 Ghana | Anomalous |
| 046 | Panama vs Croatia | Croatia 2–1 Panama | Croatia 1–0 Panama | Confirmed |
| 067 | Panama vs England | England 2–1 Panama | England 2–0 Panama | Confirmed |
| 068 | Croatia vs Ghana | Croatia 0–0 Ghana | Croatia 2–1 Ghana | Anomalous |
Group L is the Institute's most structurally inverted completed group. The certified group winner, Croatia, finished second; the certified second-place side, Ghana, finished third; the certified third-place side, England, won the group outright with seven points. Only Panama's fourth-place finish was correctly certified, and Panama finished without a single point — a more categorical elimination than even the Institute projected. England, whom the Institute certified to lose to both Croatia and Ghana, instead defeated Croatia 4–2 in the opening fixture and Panama 2–0 in the final round while drawing Ghana. The certified Croatian superiority was not borne out across ninety minutes in any fixture England played. The Institute notes this group without further elaboration. It is filed.
· · ·